I initially got the impression that Ray found religious people to simply be silly, or at least the oblivious victims of a god virus. I disagree that victims are completely oblivious, and I strongly hold that maintaining a religious perspective involves conscious decisions made to that effect as much as one would continually face decisions while living life as a skeptic. Still, half-way into it, the author takes his analogy a little too far from time to time. However, I think the goldmine in the book is not his leaps to make the analogy between religion and a virus seem closer than it is, but rather his look at the propagation and history of religious development when he is momentarily free of his “virus” idea. I wonder if the analogy would have made a great introductory paragraph or chapter if left at that – it’s possible. I look forward to reading more of his real theory, free of his attention-grabbing illustration.
S.A.M.
Interesting, I hadn't heard of that book before. I would consider reading it but I have a whole pile of books that are already begging to be read so it may end up quite a long way down the priority list. If you'd recommend it that is.
ReplyDeleteI'll keep you posted. As of now, it's not a must-read, but maybe it has a big twist at the end!
ReplyDelete